Category Archives: Diagnosis

3 years ago Diagnosis

Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action- from AJOG

  • Agarwal, S. K., Chapron, C., Giudice, L. C., Laufer, M. R., Leyland, N., Missmer, S. A., … & Taylor, H. S. (2019). Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology220(4), 354-e1. Retrieved from https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(19)30002-X/fulltext 

“Endometriosis can have a profound impact on women’s lives, including associated pain, infertility, decreased quality of life, and interference with daily life, relationships, and livelihood. The first step in alleviating these adverse sequelae is to diagnose the underlying condition. For many women, the journey to endometriosis diagnosis is long and fraught with barriers and misdiagnoses. Inherent challenges include a gold standard based on an invasive surgical procedure (laparoscopy) and diverse symptomatology, contributing to the well-established delay of 4–11 years from first symptom onset to surgical diagnosis. We believe that remedying the diagnostic delay requires increased patient education and timely referral to a women’s healthcare provider and a shift in physician approach to the disorder. Endometriosis should be approached as a chronic, systemic, inflammatory, and heterogeneous disease that presents with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or infertility, rather than focusing primarily on surgical findings and pelvic lesions. Using this approach, symptoms, signs, and clinical findings of endometriosis are anticipated to become the main drivers of clinical diagnosis and earlier intervention. Combining these factors into a practical algorithm is expected to simplify endometriosis diagnosis and make the process accessible to more clinicians and patients, culminating in earlier effective management. The time has come to bridge disparities and to minimize delays in endometriosis diagnosis and treatment for the benefit of women worldwide.”

3 years ago Diagnosis

But your tests are all negative?

So often we get questions in our Facebook group about diagnostic studies for endometriosis. Patients are told repeatedly, your MRI/CT Scan/US/colonoscopy showed nothing, so you are disease free. This makes the path to diagnosis long and difficult for the patient. Since classic endometriosis symptoms are so pervasive and painful, these women persist in seeking answers. Still, on average, it takes 9 years to get a diagnosis.

While scans can RULE IN endometriosis (particularly deep infiltrating endometriosis and endometriomas), they CANNOT DEFINITIVELY RULE OUT endometriosis. And yet, sadly, patients- who have failed all the “usual” symptomatic treatment options- are not offered surgery because their scans are “negative”. And yet they are still in disabling pain! For those who have pushed through and had surgery with someone who knows what and where to look, those same patients are found to have active, painful, and removable disease!

Key points:

  • “The definitive diagnosis of endometriosis can only be made by histopathology showing endometrial glands and stroma with varying degree of inflammation and fibrosis.” (Rafique & Decherney, 2017)
  • “Currently, there are no non‐invasive tests available in clinical practice to accurately diagnose endometriosis…. Laparoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometriosis and using any non‐invasive tests should only be undertaken in a research setting.” (Nisenblat et al., 2016)

Colonoscopy:

A colonoscopy, as part of a work-up for endometriosis, is not routinely ordered (Milone et al., 2015). However, endometriosis near or on the bowel can cause bleeding from the bowel, which prompts an order for a colonoscopy to rule out other problems. However, endometriosis rarely goes through the full thickness of the bowel where it could be seen during a colonoscopy, therefore it does not rule out endometriosis on or near the bowel. In one study, a colonoscopy only found suggestive findings of intestinal involvement in 4% of the patients (who later were found to have it during surgery) and failed to find intestinal endometriosis in 92% of the patients (Milone et al., 2015).

MRI’s, CT Scans, and Ultrasounds:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI’s), CT scans, and ultrasounds can help rule out certain conditions and, in some cases, confirm the likelihood that endometriosis is present. MRI’s and ultrasounds can be helpful in diagnosing deeply infiltrating endometriosis and ovarian endometriotic cysts; however, they cannot rule out the presence of all endometriosis (Ferrero, 2019). While Ct scans are “not useful in the diagnosis of endometriosis”, they are useful in detecting “ureteral involvement and possible renal insufficiency” (Hsu, Khachikyan, & Stratton, 2010). Peritoneal lesions are simply too small to be picked up on scans, but their presence can cause substantial peritoneal irritation and bleeding in the surrounding tissue, leading to peritoneal signs and symptoms (pallor, bloating, severe pain, rebound tenderness, painful pelvic exams, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, anxiety, restlessness, etc.). We know that the size and number of lesions do not equate with the amount of pain patients experience, so a few lesions can result in disabling pain and ALL diagnostic studies may be negative. Some invasive lesions of ligaments, organs, pelvic sidewalls likewise will not show up on scans/tests. While advances in techniques are being made, the use of those are not mainstream yet (Leonardi et al., 2020; Leonardi, Robledo, Espada, Vanza, & Condous, 2020).

Symptoms:

“By taking a careful history of patients and considering their symptoms, the disease may be greatly suspected” (Riazi et al, 2015). Symptoms such as menstrual pain, pelvic pain, pain with sex, noncyclic pain, urinary symptoms, and painful defecation during menses all had a higher predictive value of a diagnosis of endometriosis (Riazi et al., 2015). Some other symptoms might include: pain with exercise, nausea, constipation, diarrhea (often diagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome but more often than not related to endo), bleeding from the rectum, pain with a full bladder, fatigue, and so forth.  It can also be difficult to correlate symptoms as part of a whole picture. This is why it is important for the patient to be self-educated, know the correlating symptoms, and be able to give a detailed summary.

Physical Exam:

Most patients have a normal physical exam making it a poor indicator (Hsu, Khachikyan, & Stratton, 2010). However, if the examiner finds abnormalities such as tenderness, nodularity, masses, or a fixed uterus, this can “suggest the benefit of imaging prior to surgery” (Hsu, Khachikyan, & Stratton, 2010).

Surgery:

We have even seen patients having had a laparoscopy being told that “your ovaries tubes and uterus are pristine, you have no endo”. But given that the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries are well down the list on frequency of involvement, a pronouncement of pristine organs does not mean that endometriosis is not present. In most cases, the disease will be found elsewhere.

Hormonal Suppression:

Another indicator some use to determine if endometriosis is likely is if there is a reduction in symptoms in response to hormonal medications. However, “relief of chronic pelvic pain symptoms, or lack of response, with preoperative hormonal therapy is not an accurate predictor of presence or absence of histologically confirmed endometriosis at laparoscopy” (Jenkins, Liu, & White, 2008). Hormonal therapy may affect the inflammation of the lesions and may make it more difficult for some to be able to detect lesions (and therefore miss the disease). While the suppression of ovulation can help when addressing the ovary, it can also cause missed disease in subtle and typical lesions, smaller ovarian lesions, deep endometriosis, and appendicular endometriosis (Koninckx, 2016). Also, while hormonal suppression may help some with symptom management, it does not eradicate the lesions (Vercellini et al., 2014).

Factors Affecting the Tests:

While diagnostic studies can helpful in many situations, they are inadequate alone in the determination of the presence or absence of endometriosis. The sensitivity of the test is only as good as the interpreter’s knowledge and skills of how to detect signs of endometriosis (Leonardi et al., 2020; Exacoustos, Manganaro, & Zupi, 2014). We are starting to see some gynecologists doing their own vaginal ultrasounds and picking up adenomyosis where others say it is not in evidence. Likewise, some radiologists, as they have grown familiar with larger lesions of endometriosis on the bowel or rectal vaginal areas, are picking up the possibilities. However, NEGATIVE STUDIES DO NOT RULE OUT ENDOMETRIOSIS.  Symptoms/history and pelvic exams that indicate a suspicion of endometriosis should dictate further care. The gold standard for diagnosis remains the laparoscopic exam- which hopefully will offer excision of the disease during the same procedure.

Conclusion:

These tests can be very useful. Some doctors use MRI’s or ultrasounds as part of the pre-operative evaluation to prepare for what needs to be done at surgery (such as consulting a gastrointestinal surgeon to be a part of the surgical team in the suspicion of bowel endometriosis). However, at this time, negative tests do not definitively rule out the diagnosis of endometriosis.

References

Exacoustos, C., Manganaro, L., & Zupi, E. (2014). Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology28(5), 655-681. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1521693414000820

Ferrero, S. (2019). Proteomics in the diagnosis of endometriosis: opportunities and challenges. PROTEOMICS–Clinical Applications13(3), 1800183. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/prca.201800183

Hsu, A. L., Khachikyan, I., & Stratton, P. (2010). Invasive and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology53(2), 413. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880548/

Jenkins, T. R., Liu, C. Y., & White, J. (2008). Does response to hormonal therapy predict presence or absence of endometriosis?. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology15(1), 82-86. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18262150/

Koninckx, P. (2016). Guidelines for medical therapy before and after surgery for endometriosis. Retrieved from https://www.gynsurgery.org/endometriosis/medical-therapy-before-and-after-surgery-for-endometriosis/

Leonardi, M., Ong, J., Espada, M., Stamatopoulos, N., Georgousopoulou, E., Hudelist, G., & Condous, G. (2020). One‐size‐fits‐all approach does not work for gynecology trainees learning endometriosis ultrasound skills. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jum.15337

Leonardi, M., Robledo, K. P., Espada, M., Vanza, K., & Condous, G. (2020). SonoPODography: A new diagnostic technique for visualizing superficial endometriosis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301211520305637?dgcid=author

Milone, M., Mollo, A., Musella, M., Maietta, P., Fernandez, L. M. S., Shatalova, O., … & Milone, F. (2015). Role of colonoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of bowel endometriosis. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG21(16), 4997. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408473/

Nisenblat, V., Prentice, L., Bossuyt, P. M., Farquhar, C., Hull, M. L., & Johnson, N. (2016). Combination of the non‐invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7).  Retrieved from https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012281/full

Rafique, S., & Decherney, A. H. (2017). Medical management of endometriosis. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology60(3), 485.  Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794019/

Riazi, H., Tehranian, N., Ziaei, S., Mohammadi, E., Hajizadeh, E., & Montazeri, A. (2015). Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review. BMC women’s health15(1), 39. Retrieved from https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-015-0196-z

Vercellini, P., Viganò, P., Somigliana, E., & Fedele, L. (2014). Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nature Reviews Endocrinology10(5), 261. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/nrendo.2013.255

3 years ago Diagnosis

Labwork and Blood Tests

While several companies are working to develop one, there is no single blood test that can definitively diagnose endometriosis yet. It takes a long time to determine if a test has the reliability “so that no patients with actual endometriosis would be missed and no women without endometriosis would be selected for potentially unnecessary additional procedures” (Signorile & Baldi, 2018). Some blood tests can be used to rule out other problems and can give an indication to investigate further. In addition to blood tests, labwork could include analysis of peritoneal fluids that can indicate the inflammatory process from endometriosis (although this is done more for research purposes) (Wang, Ma, & Song, 2018). Part of the labwork from surgery includes the histology (looking at the tissue under the microscope) to identify the tissue as endometriosis.

“The gold standard for the diagnosis of peritoneal endometriosis has been visual inspection by laparoscopy followed by histological confirmation. However, the invasive nature of surgery, coupled with the lack of a laboratory biomarker for the disease, results in a mean latency of 7–11 years from onset of symptoms to definitive diagnosis. Unfortunately, the delay in diagnosis may have significant consequences in terms of disease progression. The discovery of a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker for the nonsurgical detection of endometriosis promises earlier diagnosis and prevention of deleterious sequelae and represents a clear research priority….The most important goal of the test is that no women with endometriosis or other significant pelvic pathology are missed who might benefit from surgery for endometriosis-associated pain and/or infertility.” (Fassbender et al., 2015, para. 1, 5)

Under Investigation:

Studies:

  • Anastasiu, C. V., Moga, M. A., Elena Neculau, A., Bălan, A., Scârneciu, I., Dragomir, R. M., … & Chicea, L. M. (2020). Biomarkers for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences21(5), 1750. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/5/1750

“The majority of studies focused on a panel of biomarkers, rather than a single biomarker and were unable to identify a single biomolecule or a panel of biomarkers with sufficient specificity and sensitivity in endometriosis. Conclusion: Noninvasive biomarkers, proteomics, genomics, and miRNA microarray may aid the diagnosis, but further research on larger datasets along with a better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms are needed.”

“Despite decades of research, there are no sufficiently sensitive and specific signs and symptoms nor blood tests for the clinical confirmation of endometriosis, which hampers prompt diagnosis and treatment. The huge majority of potential biomarkers has been discarded in research stage and very few have been translated to clinical practice. Serum CA-125 is the most studied and used one, but studies have shown its poor diagnostic performance. Several factors involved in the chronic inflammatory process of endometriosis, such as hormones, cytokines, chemokines, angiogenic factors, oxidative stress markers and others, have been implicated in the disease’s pathogenesis and have been extensively studied, but not a single one has successfully been able to accurately identify the disease. MicroRNAs have emerged more recently but their utility to detect endometriosis remains uncertain. The search for a biomarker or a set of biomarkers is still open and may benefit from novel molecular biology and bioinformatics approaches to mine and uncover molecular signatures specifically associated with the disease.”

“Numerous studies have been carried out with the aim of identifying endometriosis diagnostic markers in the serum. Unfortunately, none of the proposed biomarkers has been found to date, by themselves, to reach a clinically significant diagnostic specificity, as recently reviewed (1517). As a consequence, none of the investigated biomarkers is presently used in routine clinical care.

“An ideal diagnostic test for endometriosis should have high sensitivity and high specificity, displaying a low number of false negative and false positive results, so that no patients with actual endometriosis would be missed and no women without endometriosis would be selected for potentially unnecessary additional procedures.”

References

Fassbender, A., Burney, R. O., F O, D., D’Hooghe, T., & Giudice, L. (2015). Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis. BioMed research international2015. Retrieved from https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/130854/

Wang, X. M., Ma, Z. Y., & Song, N. (2018). Inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, TNF-α and peritoneal fluid flora were associated with infertility in patients with endometriosis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci22(9), 2513-2518. https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2513-2518.pdf

3 years ago Diagnosis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI’s) and endometriosis

Surgery is the only method for definitive diagnosis of endometriosis; however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI’s) can be used for preoperative planning as well as ruling out other related conditions. It is important to have a team who knows the correct protocol for imaging and for reading the images.

In this study, you will find correlations between MRI findings and surgical confirmations. The authors also discuss the best way to get the best images. Please follow the link for more information and for associated images. 

“Diagnostic imaging is necessary for treatment planning. MRI is as a second-line technique after ultrasound. The MRI appearance of endometriotic lesions is variable and depends on the quantity and age of haemorrhage, the amount of endometrial cells, stroma, smooth muscle proliferation and fibrosis. The purpose of surgery is to achieve complete resection of all endometriotic lesions in the same operation.” Preparing for the MRI: “In preparation for imaging, it is recommended that patients fast (4–6 h) before the examination. Bowel preparation includes an enema administered approximately 2–3 h before the examination. The study should not be conducted during the menstrual cycle. MR imaging is performed with moderate repletion of the patient’s bladder, since an overfilled bladder may cause detrusor contractions and may obliterate the adjacent recesses thus compromising the identification of small parietal nodules. On the other hand, an empty bladder prevents optimal visualization of the ureters. MR imaging is performed with the patient lying in the supine position (entry position feet first). In patients who show a dilatation of the excretory system, the urographic phase is acquired in the prone position. In claustrophobic patients, prone position may reduce anxiety and improve exam acceptability. When the clinical evaluation suggests a rectosigmoid endometriosis, rectal opacification is performed before the examination. Retrograde distension of the rectum and the sigmoid colon is obtained inside the gantry with a rectal enema of 750 mL of saline solution introduced through a Nelaton catheter (20 Ch, 6.67 mm × 360 mm). Bowel cleansing is performed through oral administration of a polyethylene glycol solution (1000 mL) the day before the study. In these patients the intravenous administration of an antispasmodic agent, scopolamine-N-butyl bromide (Buscopan® 20 mg; Boehringer Ingelheim, Milano, Italy) just before image acquisition is mandatory to reduce motion artefacts caused by bowel peristalsis. Even if rectal opacification is not strictly necessary to detect endometriotic lesions of the intestinal wall, rectal distension may be useful to evaluate the degree of bowel stenosis.”Conclusions: “Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting women during the reproductive lifespan. Diagnosis of endometriosis must take into account clinical symptoms, physical examination, laboratory tests and different imaging techniques. Since pelvic anatomy is complex and may vary with distortion by invasive endometriosis, the radiologist must be aware of both normal and deranged anatomy.“The ideal purpose of surgery is a therapeutic and effective intervention based on a careful preoperative evaluation. From this point of view, the role of MR imaging to help diagnose and plan surgical strategy is critical in the management of the disease. Preoperative detection of all endometriotic lesions is recommended to choose the surgical approach and to plan a multidisciplinary team work. This multidisciplinary approach including radiologists, gynaecologists, urologists, gastrointestinal surgeons, and (in selected cases) neurosurgeons, is recommended to improve diagnostic imaging accuracy and patients’ outcome, and to reduce postoperative complication rates. The recent awareness that endometriosis may be medically treated based on strong clinical suspicion and that laparoscopy should be intended for surgical treatment, not for diagnostic purposes, furtherly enhance the role of non-invasive diagnostic procedures and particularly of MR imaging.“In any case, due to the complexity of the disease, it is appropriate to centralize the overall care of endometriosis patients to reference centres in order to pursue a patient-centred approach tailored to the patient’s specific condition and desires.”

In this study, you will see more information on the best techniques for performing the MRI as well as what to look for on the MRI findings. Please follow the link for more information as well as images. 

Technique: “A dedicated MRI protocol is essential for identification of disease and surgical planning. MRI imaging at 3 Tesla is preferred due to superior resolution….Administration of intravenous contrast is important, as areas of mural nodularity or solid components may exist within an ovarian lesion, and is essential to differentiate endometriomas from other cystic neoplasms….Rectal and vaginal gel help optimize visualization of endometriosis deposits on the vaginal and rectal wall.”Superficial endometriosis: “Superficial endometriosis is often not detectable with MRI or ultrasound.”Endometriomas: “On MRI, ovarian endometriomas have a characteristic homogeneous T1W hyperintensity and a relatively low T2W signal intensity. There can be heterogeneity to the T2W hypointensity, called T2W “shading”, caused by blood products in various stages of degradation from multiple episodes of bleeding. A more specific sign in the diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas is the “T2 dark spot sign,” defined as discrete markedly hypointense foci within the cyst on T2-weighted images, with or without T2 shading. In distinguishing ovarian endometriomas from non-endometrioma hemorrhagic cystic lesions, a study has shown T2 shading to have a 93% sensitivity, 45% specificity, 72% positive predictive value (PPV) and 81% negative predictive value (NPV), while T2 dark spots had a 93% sensitivity, 45% specificity, 72% PPV and 81% NPV (Figure 2).7”Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE): “Occasionally small foci of T2W hyperintensity representing the ectopic endometrial glands can be seen.9 This solid type of endometriosis may be harder to identify on MRI, however, postcontrast, these lesions demonstrate delayed enhancement similar to fibrosis. Common locations for DIE include the uterosacral ligaments, anterior rectosigmoid colon, bladder, rectovaginal septum, round ligaments, and muscular wall of pelvic organs. It can also be found in scar tissue, and has been reported in C-section scars within the uterine wall or anterior abdominal wall (Figure 4).11 Uterosacral Ligaments: “Uterosacral ligaments are the most common location for DIE (Figure 5). With disease involvement, the ligaments can become thickened and develop adhesions to surrounding structures. MRI is noted to have a 69% sensitivity and >90% specificity for diagnosing uterosacral ligament deep infiltrating endometriosis, and is better than endorectal and endovaginal ultrasound.9”Intestinal: “DIE can deeply invade into the muscularis propria of the rectosigmoid colon and this deep invasion typically requires surgical resection. At MRI, this has been described as a “mushroom cap” sign where the low intensity of the mushroom base is attributed to hypertrophy and fibrosis of the muscularis propria and the high signal intensity of the mushroom cap is attributed to the intact, overlying mucosa and submucosa which are displaced into the bowel lumen (Figure 6) .9”Bladder: “Bladder involvement with DIE usually involves the posterior wall and can result in partial or complete obliteration of the vesicouterine pouch. Similar to DIE in other locations, bladder involvement with DIE can appear as T2W hypointense infiltrative or nodular lesions centered in the vesicouterine pouch. There can be variable foci of T1W and T2W signal intensity within these DIE lesions, which represent the trapped endometrial glands (Figure 7).” Round Ligament: “The round ligament is another site which can be involved with DIE, with one study of women undergoing laparoscopy for DIE showing involvement of the round ligament in 15% of cases.9”

This study differentiates between findings on the MRI and disease present at surgery. Follow the link to see more information as well as several pictures. 

  • Thalluri, A. L., Knox, S., & Nguyen, T. (2017). MRI findings in deep infiltrating endometriosis: A pictorial essay. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology61(6), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12680 

“In conclusion, endometriosis is an important gynaecological disorder which can impact significantly an individual’s quality of life and has major implications on fertility. Pre‐operative MRI has high specificity for the diagnosis and characterization of disease extent, and may guide surgical management, which remains the mainstay of curative treatment.” Posterior cul de sac: “The posterior cul‐de‐sac (recto‐uterine pouch) represents the lowest portion of the abdomino‐pelvic cavity in the supine position. Disease here is responsible for the majority of symptomatic cases of endometriosis and may significantly hinder laparoscopic assessment and treatment due to poor access and visualization as result of compartment obliteration. On MRI, posterior cul‐de‐sac disease is characterized by endometrial plaques which display T1 hyperintensity and variable T2 signal, dependent on the composition of haemorrhage, glandular content and fibrosis….Adhesions may appear as subtle low signal strands between organs and bowel loops. MRI accuracy has been reported as 71.9% in demonstrating features of posterior cul‐de‐sac obliteration and 61.4% for highlighting adhesions in the posterior cul‐de‐sac.Intestinal: “Intestinal endometriosis occurs in 12–37% of endometriosis patients with the rectosigmoid colon the most commonly affected region. Clinical features vary from mild to severe and include cyclical abdominal pain, constipation/diarrhoea, dyschezia and haematochezia. Implants are usually serosal and have the potential to erode through the sub‐serosal layers (although will rarely involve the mucosa), with resultant thickening and fibrosis of the muscularis propria. Cyclical haemorrhage and intermittent leakage of endometriotic contents result in a chronic inflammatory reaction leading to the formation of adhesions and bowel strictures. A pre‐operative diagnosis of bowel involvement may highlight the need for colorectal input should bowel resection be required. On MRI, bowel adhesions are visualized similar to posterior cul‐de‐sac adhesions; there may be clustering or tethering of bowel loops with direct bands, poor interface visualization and loss of pericolic or peri‐mesenteric fat planes. Endometriomas: “Endometriomas represent thick‐walled cysts, containing degenerated blood products. They can involve a variety of pelvic locations with the majority occurring within the ovaries. MRI is the best imaging modality for identifying endometriomas, with a specificity of 98%.Anteflexion and Retroflexion of the uterus: “Anteflexion of the uterus may occur when there is endometriosis and adhesion formation in the anterior compartment between the bladder peritoneal reflection and the anterior uterine serosa….Retroflexion of the uterus occurs when there is endometriotic involvement of the posterior compartment, in particular the uterosacral ligaments. The torus uterinus is a small transverse thickening that binds the original insertion of the uterosacral ligaments to the posterior cervix. On MRI, the torus uterinus is usually unable to be viewed unless there is pathological thickening present, such as in endometriotic involvement. This causes fibrosis of the ligaments, tethering the uterus posteriorly and resulting in uterine retroflexion (Fig. 4). When retroflexion of the uterus has occurred, there is often irregular configuration or shortening of the posterior surface of the uterus, which is indicative of tethering.”Thickened uterosacral ligament: “The uterosacral ligament attaches the cervix to the sacrum and holds the uterus in position. The uterosacral ligament, in addition to the posterior cul‐de‐sac, is the most common pelvic sites of involvement in deep pelvic endometriosis, with specificity for the diagnosis of uterosacral ligament endometriosis greater than 90% on MRI. The proximal, medial uterosacral ligament portion is the most commonly affected part by endometriosis.” Haematosalpinx: “Endometriotic involvement of the fallopian tubes usually occurs within the sub‐serosal layer and is strongly associated with infertility due to resultant peritubal adhesions and subsequent tubal obstruction. On MRI, the presence of T1 hyperintense blood products within a dilated tube (haematosalpinx) is highly specific for endometriosis, and may be the only feature of disease on MRI.”Elevated vaginal fornices: “Vaginal forniceal elevation may occur in endometriosis as a result of regional adhesions. There are several MRI features of forniceal elevation including the upper level of the fornix being superior to the angle of the uterine isthmus, acute angulation of the fornix, or the fornix being visibly pulled in a superior direction with subsequent stretching of the vaginal wall. Thickening of the superior one‐third of posterior vaginal wall with or without nodularity may also be visualized. Nodules are identified as low signal intensity foci on T2WI.T1WI (particularly fat saturated images) may show high signal intensity indicative of active/subacute haemorrhagic deposits.”

3 years ago Diagnosis

Ultrasound Use with Endometriosis

While endometriosis cannot be conclusively diagnosed using ultrasound, it can be useful in ruling in/out other conditions and giving clinical data before further treatment. Ultrasounds might be useful in detecting endometriomas or deep-infiltrating endometriosis. This can enable the surgeon to have the best team prepared for surgery. It is important to have a team who knows the correct protocol for imaging and for reading the images. 

Studies:

“Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity of routine trans vaginal ultrasound (TVUS) compared to expert-guided transvaginal ultrasound (ETVUS) for the diagnosis of endometriosis….Conclusions: ETVUS is more sensitive than routine TVUS to diagnose endometriosis, identifying lesions other than endometrioma and is of assistance in surgical planning and patient counseling.”

  • Guerriero, S., Saba, L., Pascual, M. A., Ajossa, S., Rodriguez, I., Mais, V., & Alcazar, J. L. (2018). Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology51(5), 586-595.  Retrieved from https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.18961  

“Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of TVS and MRI is similar for detecting DIE involving rectosigmoid, uterosacral ligaments and rectovaginal septum.”

  • Menakaya, U., Reid, S., Lu, C., Bassem, G., Infante, F., & Condous, G. (2016). Performance of ultrasound‐based endometriosis staging system (UBESS) for predicting level of complexity of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology48(6), 786-795.  Retrieved from https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.15858 

“This was a multicenter prospective and retrospective cohort study on consecutive women with suspected endometriosis who underwent laparoscopy between June 2009 and July 2013. Each woman underwent a systematic transvaginal ultrasound evaluation to assess the pelvis for different phenotypes of endometriosis, and the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for these different phenotypes was evaluated relative to the gold standard, laparoscopy….Conclusion: UBESS could be utilized to predict the level of complexity of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. It has the potential to facilitate the triage of women with suspected endometriosis to the most appropriate surgical expertise required for laparoscopic endometriosis surgery.”

3 years ago Diagnosis

Surgery

While a working diagnosis of endometriosis might be made from symptoms or other tests, a definitive diagnosis is only made by surgery with biopsy. It is important for your surgeon to have knowledge about all the different appearances of endometriosis as well as all the different areas it can be found . It is also more efficient and cost-saving for your surgeon to be able to treat at the same time when a diagnostic surgery is performed. 

“Your doctor or nurse might suspect that you have endometriosis based on your symptoms of pelvic pain or painful menstrual periods. However, the only way to know for sure if you have endometriosis is to have surgery so a doctor can actually see and biopsy the abnormal tissue. Endometriosis cannot be diagnosed by ultrasound, x-ray, or other noninvasive methods.” –  https://www.uptodate.com/contents/endometriosis-beyond-the-basics 

Reference

Jose, C., Fausto, A., & Antonio, L. (2018). Laparoscopic Enhanced Imaging Modalities for the Identification of Endometriosis Implants a Review of the Current Status. MOJ Womens Health7(1), 00160. DOI: 10.15406/mojwh.2018.07.00160

iCareBetter

[hubspot type=form portal=6899175 id=569b000f-da05-4468-a8bf-aac1f774e09d]